Nepal – the country of the Buddha and the Mt. Everest

Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without – Buddha

Russia: The Revolution Will Be Tweeted and Facebooked and YouTubed

Posted by Ram Kumar Shrestha on January 16, 2012


Russian demonstrators take part in a mass anti-Putin rally in Moscow on Dec., 24, 2011 in Moscow

When Russia’s protest movement came alive last month, bringing tens of thousands of people onto the streets of Moscow, it only took an Internet connection to realize that its most vital cogs and gears were online. There had to be hundreds if not thousands of them, like an army of virtual worker ants, doing the grunt work that goes into a revolution in the 21st century. Someone had to be facilitating the movement’s Facebook groups, making its YouTube clips, tweeting and blogging its propaganda. And so there were. On a snowy night in December, dozens of them got together at a bar called Masterskaya, just down the street from the Kremlin, and turned the place into a buzzing revolutionary workshop.

At the time, the next big protest against Vladimir Putin’s government was only two days away, and the Prime Minister (who has said that he rarely uses the Internet) had just given the protesters an adrenaline shot by comparing them to Bandar-log, the wayward monkeys from Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book. Their meeting at Masterskaya (the name of the bar, appropriately enough, means Workshop) was partly geared toward proving him wrong.

The volunteers were not only better organized than a lot of Russia’s bureaucracy but also far more dedicated. “I haven’t slept in three days,” boasted Rustem Davydov, 42, a scruffy TV producer wearing three layers of hooded sweatshirts. By day, Davydov told TIME, he worked at a state-run television channel, wearing a suit and tie, by night he put on his sweatshirts and sat on Facebook coordinating the opposition groups. Two weeks of this schizophrenic schedule had made him look like he needed a drink, but he refused one. “There is too much work to do,” he said.(Read “The Russian Winter: Putin Goes Prophylactic with the Protests.”)

At a table near the bar, a group of college students were cutting white ribbons — the symbols of the movement — from little plastic spools, taking the time to flay the ends of each to make it pretty. (Putin, in another snide remark, had said on live TV a week before that the ribbons looked like “dangling condoms.”) Near the entryway, graffiti artists were spray-painting posters of Putin with the horns of a ram. “Go Roam in Another Country,” its caption read. Stacks of stickers were passed around, showing Putin’s face with a big red line through it, like a no-smoking sign. (Almost everyone in the place, by the way, was smoking, and the bar’s dimly lit rooms were filled with a noxious haze.)

At one point, a producer for the BBC went up to Maria Baronova, a chemist who has volunteered to be a press secretary for the movement, and asked who was in charge of flash mobs. Baronova, a svelte blond, promptly shouted the question out — “Who’s got flash mobs?!” — and a group of eight beatnik-looking men and women turned away from their huddle and raised their arms. Every table was crammed with its own team of activists, and standing among them felt like being inside some churning organism, where each cluster of cells was fulfilling its own function but for the same basic purpose: change.

One of the projects debated that night was far more ambitious than stickers and flash mobs. Its goal was to create a kind of virtual democracy in Russia, allowing people to register on a newly designed website, verify their identities and vote directly on the aims and leaders of the opposition movement. Alexei Navalny, the blogger who has been at the forefront of the protests, imagines it as a “reconstituted Facebook,” and brushes off the notion that such chat-room politics could have little impact on the real world. In the present day, he says, “the split between the virtual and real worlds is no longer relevant.” In December, the opposition organized the biggest protests Russia has seen since the fall of the Soviet Union, and it did so by virtual means, primarily using Facebook. “Nonetheless, I think [the protests] were more than real enough,” Navalny tells TIME.(Watch TIME’s video “Kashmir: Taking the Revolution Online.”)

After the second protest, which brought 50,000 people onto Moscow’s Bolotnaya Square, the Kremlin started making real concessions, proposing a law to make it easier for opposition groups to take part in actual elections, not virtual ones. But a new problem quickly arose: Who were the leaders of the opposition movement? Navalny says there are none. “Nobody has a mandate right now to negotiate for [all the protesters],” he says. “If any person says he’s going to speak on their behalf, he’s little more than a braggart and an aphorist at this point, including me.” The only way to get this mandate is to create a parallel democracy online, where the protesters can choose a team of leaders.

One attempt to hold such a vote was made in late December, using an online polling service called, but it ended in a fiasco. Navalny came in first place, as predicted, but in second place was the convicted conman Sergei Mavrodi, who has nothing to do with the opposition. In third place was another spurious outsider, the neo-Nazi leader Maxim Martsinkevich, who goes by the nickname Tesak, meaning Hatchet. The movement’s organizing committee, which is chaired by Navalny, ruled that the vote had obviously been rigged and scrapped it. One of its IT gurus, Alexander Gornik, 27, soon set out to develop a special site to avoid a repeat of the embarrassment. By early January, around 60 people, including a handful of software engineers, had volunteered to help build the “electronic democracy,” Gornik says. The main criteria, he tells TIME, “are simplicity and speed of implementation, so we can vote in time for the next protest,” which is scheduled for Feb. 4.

The idea of an electronic democracy is unprecedented in Russia, but in other parts of the world such projects have been known as Democracy 2.0, an umbrella term for letting regular folks influence politics through the Internet. It’s most famous application came in 2009, when U.S. President Barack Obama created the Citizen’s Briefing Book just after his inauguration. It was a bold attempt to crowdsource policy ideas online, and it received 44,000 proposals, on which 1.4 million online votes were cast. But the results were an embarrassment, not so much for Obama as for the voters taking part. “In the middle of two wars and an economic meltdown, the highest-ranking idea was to legalize marijuana,” the columnist Anand Giridharadas wrote in the New York Times that fall. “Revoking the Church of Scientology’s tax-exempt status garnered three times more votes than raising funding for childhood cancer.”(Read “The Revolution Will Be YouTubed: Syria’s Video Rebels.”)

So it makes sense that some of Russia’s opposition leaders are concerned about switching to an online democracy, because it can always be skewed by the Internet’s abundance of kooks and fraudsters. A few of them have complained that someone like Ksenia Sobchak, a celebrity heiress often called Russia’s Paris Hilton, would win any online election. On Twitter, she has almost 300,000 followers, nearly twice as many as Navalny. “But I tell them, ‘Dudes, it’s a vote,'” Navalny says. “If you’re scared Ksenia Sobchak will beat you, then why are you saying you want the presidency? If you’re afraid of a vote, sit home.'”

In any case, the Russian opposition has little choice but to have their supporters vote online, because Putin’s Democracy 1.0 has effectively locked them out. When several of the opposition leaders tried to form a political party last summer, they were denied registration by the Ministry of Justice, and thus banned from taking part in elections. Nor do they have the option of holding a physical summit, where paper ballots could be cast. This would require renting a venue big enough to hold a quorum of the protesters, like a stadium, and no landlord would risk angering the government by renting such a space to the opposition, Navalny says. “The police will come and break it up.”

Sure enough, that fear was confirmed when the activists tried to gather for a second night at Masterskaya. By midnight, the police showed up, and a handful of the activists were detained, taken to the station and released without charge. “It was just a stupid act of intimidation,” says Baronova, the movement’s spokeswoman. But in some sense, it worked. The activists were forced to look for another venue, while many retreated back to the safety of the Web. Clearly the split between the real and virtual worlds is not as irrelevant as Navalny claims.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: